Workflow solution / Prediction markets
Polybot
A heavily iterated prediction-market automation system that treats execution discipline as the product.
A Python automation system for market monitoring, execution, sizing, and operational guardrails across fast-moving prediction markets, originally built around 15-minute markets and iterated hundreds of times.
Status
Prototype
Timeline
Hundreds of execution iterations
Domain
Prediction markets
Why
Workflow solution
Execution guard
15m+ market automation
Cap
$20
Iterations
100s
Mode
Guarded
Freshness, edge, bankroll cap, no-trade reasons, and hundreds of strategy iterations.
Stack
Languages, services, data sources, and operating pieces behind the build.
Code Proof
What The Build Actually Contains
LOC
60k+
Source files
116
Runtime
Python
Guard
Risk caps
Product proof
Execution guard
15m+ market automation
Cap
$20
Iterations
100s
Mode
Guarded
Freshness, edge, bankroll cap, no-trade reasons, and hundreds of strategy iterations.
Implementation
Code Behind The Surface
Guard before execution
pyThe core move behind the product surface.
if not ws_snapshot.is_fresh(max_age_seconds=2):
return skip("stale market data")
stake = min(bankroll_fraction(edge), DIRECTIONAL_CAP_USD)
if stake < MIN_TRADE_USD:
return skip("edge too small")
executor.place_order(market_id, side, stake)Product Model
tsThe useful answer has to be modeled before the UI can make it obvious.
type ProductSurface = {
input: "Prediction markets";
signal: "Can an automated prediction-market system stay disciplined when the market window is";
proof: string[];
};
const surface: ProductSurface = {
input: "Prediction markets",
signal: "Freshness, edge, bankroll cap, no-trade reasons, and hundreds of strategy iterations",
proof: [
"15-minute and short-window market monitoring",
"Execution sizing guardrails",
"WebSocket freshness checks",
"Manual trade script"
],
};Hard Part
tsEvery build has a constraint: data quality, workflow shape, trust, speed, or operational risk.
const constraint = {
project: "Polybot",
status: "Prototype",
category: "Workflow solution",
hardPart: "The product lesson is the structure required to make automation behave under pressure: limits, fallbacks, obse...",
};
shipSurface(constraint);Project Logic
Why This Exists
The point is not to show another screen. It is to show the gap, the build constraint, and the proof of work.
Mission
Can an automated prediction-market system stay disciplined when the market window is short, noisy, and execution mistakes compound fast?
Prediction markets create a strange workflow: the opportunity is brief, the data moves quickly, and a bad execution rule can do more damage than a bad thesis. Polybot started around 15-minute markets and became a long-running iteration system for edge, freshness, sizing, no-trade rules, and rollback discipline.
Build
What Had To Work
I built a Python system that watches markets, evaluates directional opportunities, sizes bets, routes execution through strict risk caps and timing guards, and keeps evolving as real market behavior exposes new failure modes.
Why It Matters
15m+ market automation
Turns fast crypto-market movement into an inspectable trade/skip decision with guardrails.
Hard Parts
Find An Edge Without Forcing A Trade
The mission was not constant execution. It was finding exploitable movement in Polymarket crypto markets, then having enough discipline to skip when the signal was stale, weak, or structurally unsafe.
Short Windows Punish Bad Assumptions
The system started around 15-minute markets, where timing, WebSocket freshness, price movement, and bankroll caps matter more than a pretty prediction.
Iteration Became The Product
Hundreds of commits hardened the rules: no-trade reasons, rollback points, manual execution paths, cap changes, and strategy variants built from what live markets exposed.
Decisions
Next Move
I would separate strategy simulation from execution, add full replay logs, and build a dashboard that makes every automated decision inspectable after the fact.
Tell Me About Your Project
Bring Me The Bottleneck.
I’ll Build The Answer.
Tell me what people are trying to do, where the current path breaks, and what kind of useful answer should exist.
Market Gap
Demand exists, but the answer is missing.
Workflow Drag
The work is still too manual, slow, or scattered.
Product Wedge
A small surface could prove the larger opportunity.